Skip to content
DeveloperHiring

HackerRank alternative for hiring developers

HackerRank tests the candidates you already have. DeveloperHiring finds the developers too: it sources them, runs a coding task with hidden tests and an AI interview, and hands you a ranked shortlist on a flat plan from $99 a month billed yearly.

Edit the role, then see the skill matrix, screening questions and a sample coding task in about a minute.

Top 5 shortlist · Senior platform engineer

#1 Candidate 3299

Go, Kubernetes, gRPC, PostgreSQL · code, interview and integrity done

95

#2 Candidate 6205

Go, Kubernetes, gRPC, PostgreSQL · code, interview and integrity done

92

#3 Candidate 5262

Go, Kubernetes, gRPC, PostgreSQL · code, interview and integrity done

89

#4 Candidate 2953

Go, Kubernetes, gRPC, PostgreSQL · code, interview and integrity done

87

#5 Candidate 8433

Go, Kubernetes, gRPC, PostgreSQL · code, interview and integrity done

86

A HackerRank alternative makes sense when testing is not what slows your hiring down. Price trackers report HackerRank Starter at $79 a month billed yearly for 60 attempts and Pro at $419 a month for 360 attempts. Both assume candidates are already in your inbox. DeveloperHiring Startup puts sourcing, 40 coding tests and 15 AI interviews a month in one subscription.

Engineering manager comparing coding assessment results for developer candidates

Who switches from HackerRank, and why?

Teams usually switch after the first plan year. They have a tidy question library and a handful of scores, and still the same empty seat. HackerRank tests the people who applied. It does not bring you anyone.

The second reason is cost per attempt. A plan is priced around candidate attempts, so a quiet hiring quarter leaves paid attempts unused and a busy one runs into overage. Reported figures put the entry plan near $15.80 an attempt at full use and double that at half use.

If you hire two to six developers a year and have no recruiter, a plan that includes candidate sourcing removes the step HackerRank leaves to you.

How do HackerRank plans compare with DeveloperHiring pricing?

HackerRank figures are third-party reported (price trackers, late September 2026), so confirm them with HackerRank before you budget. Attempts cover tests only, so the DeveloperHiring column also includes the sourcing you would buy elsewhere.

HackerRank Starter per year

$948

Reported at $79 a month billed yearly for 60 attempts, or $99 billed monthly. About $15.80 an attempt if every attempt is used.

HackerRank Pro per year

$5,028

Reported at $419 a month billed yearly for 360 attempts, with ATS integrations. Extra attempts have been listed at $20 each.

DeveloperHiring Startup per year

$1,188

Billed yearly. Candidate sourcing, 40 coding tests and 15 AI interviews each month, no placement fee.

See limits for every tier on the DeveloperHiring pricing page. The per hire math is in our HackerRank pricing article.

What are the best HackerRank alternatives?

Pick by the gap you are filling. Competitor figures are published or third-party numbers, so confirm terms before you buy.

DeveloperHiring compared with HackerRank, Codility and CodeSignal
Best forDeveloperHiringHackerRankCodilityCodeSignal
Strongest when A small team needs candidates, tests and interviews You want a familiar brand, a large question bank and live pair programming You want a task library and plagiarism signals You screen many applicants and want AI interviewers
Entry price From $99 a month billed yearly Third-party reported $948 a year (Starter) $1,200 a year (Starter) $79 a month billed annually (Build)
Finds candidates Yes, included No No No
Usage unit 40 tests and 15 AI interviews a month Attempts, overage reported by third parties 120 invite credits a year Credits, $20 for each extra
Enterprise needs Scale plan, see pricing page Quote based, SSO and full question library Custom by quote, SSO and API Pro by quote, enterprise ATS and fraud controls

Compare the other test-only vendors on the Codility alternative and CodeSignal alternative pages.

When HackerRank is the better choice

We would not move every team. Stay with HackerRank if one of these describes you.

  • Hundreds of applicants a year. When screening capacity is the bottleneck, more attempts solve it.
  • Live pair programming. The Interview product covers live coding sessions with a shared editor.
  • A large question library. If you want to pick from a deep bank across languages and domains, that is its strength.
  • Enterprise contracts. Single sign-on and custom terms are on the Enterprise plan.
Integrity report · Submission 5491

Paste events

1 small paste, from the task text

Normal

Tab switches

3 switches, longest 63 seconds

Normal

Keystroke playback

Steady typing, edits and reruns

Normal

Code similarity

32 percent with Candidate 9157 on helper code

Check

AI-generated code likelihood

Low, style matches interview answers

Low

Signals inform your team. They never reject a candidate on their own.

How hiring works without a separate test platform

Four steps from a role description to an offer your team controls.

  1. Step 1

    Describe the role

    Paste the stack, seniority, location and overlap hours. You review the skill matrix and screening questions first.

  2. Step 2

    Receive sourced candidates

    We search public developer profiles, your role page, imports and referrals, then score each match against the role.

  3. Step 3

    Compare the evidence

    Each candidate completes a coding task with hidden tests and an AI interview about their own solution. Code, transcript and scorecard sit side by side.

  4. Step 4

    Hire directly

    Meet the ranked finalists and agree pay with them. There is no placement fee on top of the plan.

Want to see the task format first? The developer coding assessment page shows a real task with hidden tests, and the technical recruiting platform page walks through the whole pipeline.

Questions about HackerRank alternatives

The best HackerRank alternatives depend on your gap. Codility and CodeSignal are the closest test-only products. DeveloperHiring fits a small team that also needs candidates, because sourcing, coding tests with hidden tests and AI interviews come in one flat plan instead of attempts plus a separate sourcing tool.

Price trackers report HackerRank Starter at $79 a month billed yearly for 60 attempts and Pro at $419 a month billed yearly for 360 attempts. Monthly billing is higher, extra attempts have been listed at $20, and Enterprise is a quote. Confirm current figures with HackerRank.

Employers should budget as if there is no free tier. The plans reported by price trackers are paid, so ask HackerRank sales whether a trial exists and what it includes, then run it on a real open role before signing an annual plan.

Startup costs $1,188 a year billed yearly, more than reported HackerRank Starter at $948 but about a fifth of Pro at $5,028. Startup also sources candidates and runs 15 AI interviews a month, which HackerRank does not include.

An attempt is one candidate taking one coding test. Plans include a fixed number a year, so unused attempts are wasted and extra ones are billed as overage. Testing 30 people on a 60 attempt plan doubles the real cost of each test.

For most small engineering teams, yes. Candidates complete a timed coding task with hidden tests and an AI interview about their solution. If you rely on live pair programming sessions or enterprise single sign-on, compare them with our Scale plan first.

No. DeveloperHiring has no placement fee, so you pay the subscription and the developer you hire. HackerRank does not charge one either, but it does not source candidates, so recruiter time or agency fees usually sit outside its price.

Related pages

Find, test and interview developers in one plan

Describe the role and review the skill matrix, screening questions and a sample coding task. Plans start at $99 a month billed yearly, with no placement fee. You choose the developer.

Top 5 verified developers for your role

Build my shortlist